آسیب‌شناسی وضعیت حکمرانی فضای مجازی در ایران بر اساس سنجش شاخص ترکیبیCGI

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی، دانشکده حکمرانی، دانشگاه تهران

2 عضو هیئت علمی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران

3 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی رفاه اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران

چکیده


با توجه به گسترش فضای مجازی در تمام ابعاد زندگی افراد و اهمیت روزافزون حکمرانی آن، هدف پژوهش حاضر آسیب‌شناسی وضعیت حکمرانی فضای مجازی در ایران است. بدین منظور سنجش شاخص ترکیبی حکمرانی فضای مجازی در مرداد و شهریور ١۴٠٣ و با پنج روش (داده‌هاى ثبتى موجود، پیمایش ملى با حجم نمونة ١٢٠٠ نفر، پیمایش تخصصى از کسب وکارهاى مرتبط با فضای مجازی با حجم نمونۀ ٣٠٠ نفر، داده‌کاوی کلان‌دادۀ شبکه‌های اجتماعی و نظرسنجی از ۶۴ خبره فضای مجازی) انجام شد. داده‌ها مقیاس‌بندی و تجمیع شدند؛ سپس وضعیت حکمرانی فضای مجازی تحلیل شد.بر اساس یافته‌ها، امتیاز شاخص ترکیبی حکمرانی فضای مجازی، ۴۰.۵ از ١٠٠ است. وضعیت هر چهار رکن آن نیز پایین‌تر از متوسط ارزیابی شد. بهترین وضعیت به «اثربخشى حکومت» با امتیاز ۴۳.۷ و «قدرت ملى» با امتیاز ۴۳.۵ مربوط است. «سرمایة اجتماعی» با ۳۹.۴ و «حاکمیت قانون» با ۳۵.۳ کمترین امتیاز را دارند. امور اجرایی و خدماتی مانند ایجاد زیرساخت‌هاى دسترسى، دولت الکترونیک، امنیت سایبری و خودکفایی در خدمات پایه کاربردى نیز از نقاط قوت آن است که مى‌تواند نقطة شروع برای حل مسائل پیچیده‌تر و جلب حمایت جامعه باشد. نقاط ضعف آن نیز در نظام مسئولیت‌پذیری، اقتصاد دانش، پیشبرد سیاست‌هاى کلان و پاسخگویی حکومت است؛ بنابراین سیاست‌های آینده باید در ارتقای اعتماد میان مردم و حاکمیت و چارچوب‌بندی رفتارهاى بازیگران در پرتو قانون تلاش کند. بدین منظور باید از ابزارهای سنتی حکمرانی مانند ممنوعیت و اجبار به رویکردهای متنوع‌تری روی آورد؛ همچنین به توازن میان ارکان حکمرانی توجه کرد و اثرات بلندمدت سیاست‌ها بر این ارکان را مدنظر قرار داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pathology of the state of cyberspace governance in Iran based on the measurement of the CGI composite index

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Naficy 1
  • علیرضا حدادی 2
  • fateme sadat Hosseini 3
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Master of Social Welfare Planning, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Given the expansion of cyberspace into all aspects of individual lives and its increasing governance significance, the present study aims to analyze the deficiencies in Iran's cyber governance. For this purpose, the Cyber Governance Index (CGI) was measured during August and September 2024 using five methods: existing registered data, a national survey with a sample size of 1,200 individuals, a specialized survey of businesses related to cyberspace with a sample size of 300 people, big data mining from social media networks, and a survey of 64 cyberspace experts. The collected data were scaled and aggregated; then the state of cyberspace governance was analyzed.
The findings showed that the score of the Cyberspace Governance Composite Index was 40.5 out of 100, with all four core pillars evaluated as below average. The best-performing domains were “Government Effectiveness” with a score of 43.7 and “National Power” with 43.5. The lowest scores were in “Social Capital” (39.4) and “Rule of Law” (35.3).
Executive and service-related functions—such as access, e-government, cybersecurity, and national self-sufficiency in basic application services—were identified as strengths that can serve as a foundation for addressing more complex issues and gaining public support. The legal system, knowledge digital economy, advancing macro policies, and government accountability are among its weaknesses.
Therefore, future policies should strive to promote trust between the public and the government and enhance the legal system and its enforcement for the present actors. To this end, it should move away from traditional tools such as prohibition and coercion to more diverse approaches, pay attention to the principle of balance between the pillars of governance, and consider the long-term effects of policies on these pillars.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Governance
  • Public Policy
  • Cyberspace
  • Measurement
  • Composite Index

مراجع

Abedi Darcheh, M. (2023). “Requirements of Islamic Governance of Cyberspace in the Second Step of the Islamic Revolution”. Journal of New Approaches to Jihadi Management and Islamic Governance, 3(1), pp. 61–81. [In Persian].
Aboojafari, R., Shojaei, M. H., and Nasrollahi, M. (2018). “The Role of Statistical System in Governance, Case Study of Technology and Innovation”. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 07(4), pp. 35–42. [In Persian].
Alarabia, A., Soares, D., Ferreira, L., and de Sá-Soares, F. (2018). Analyzing e-governance assessment initiatives: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2018).
Azadian, R. (2024). “The requirements of good provincial governance in accordance with the command of Hazrat Ali (AS) to Malik Ashtar”. Journal of Exalted Governance, 4(2), pp. 129–158. [In Persian].
Azizi, M., and Pirai, S. (2023). “Cyberspace software application in ‘jihad of explanation’”. Islamic Revolution Research, 11(4), e168676. [In Persian].
Beiginia, A., Safari, S., and Morshedizad, A. (2012). “Identifying and Prioritization of Good Governance, Public Administration Perspective”. Public Administration Perspective, 3(4). [In Persian].
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., and Yilma, K. (2023). The content governance dilemma: Digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
De Streel, A., Defreyne, E., Jacquemin, H., Ledger, M., Michel, A., Innesti, A., … and Ustowski, D. (2020). Online platforms’ moderation of illegal content online: Study for the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)652718
Dehghan Ashkezari, M. H., and Jalali Farahani, G. (2022). “Presenting a model of Islamic people-centered governance on cyberspace”. Journal of Exalted Governance, 2(4), pp. 206–245. [In Persian].
Dutta, S., and Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2023). The network readiness index 2023: Trust in a network society: A crisis of the digital age? Washington DC: Portulans Institute.
e-Governance Academy. (2023). National cyber security index 3.0: Methodology. https://ncsi.ega.ee/methodology/
Economist Impact. (2024). The inclusive internet index simulator: Iran. https://impact.economist.com/projects/inclusive-internet-index/2022/simulator/Iran
Engel, U., Quan-Haase, A., Liu, S., and Lyberg, L. (Eds.). (2022). Handbook of computational social science: Volume 1: Theory, case studies and ethics. Routledge.
European Commission. (2022). Digital economy and society index (DESI) (2022): Thematic chapters. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
Firouzabadi, S. A., and Ahmadabadi Azadi, J. (2020). “Analysis of the history of cyberspace governance in Islamic Republic of Iran”. Journal of Political Science, 16(2), pp. 563–598. [In Persian].
Fund for Peace. (2023). Fragile states index: Fragile states index annual report 2023. https://fragilestatesindex.org/
Gholami, R., and Poorheydar, A. (2021). “The Hexagonal Pattern of Cyberspace Governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran”. Journal of Iran Futures Studies, 6(1), pp. 1–26. doi:10.30479/jfs.2021.13693.1205. [In Persian].
Ghorbani, A., Hamzehpour, M., and Kia, A. A. (2023). “Identification and Strategic Analysis of Effective Factors on Improving the Governance of Cyberspace in the Islamic Republic of Iran”. New Media Studies, 9(36), pp. 1–43. doi:10.22054/nms.2024.74593.1594. [In Persian].
Ghorbani, A., and Khayami, A. (2024). “Discourse Analysis of the ‘Supporting Users' Rights and Basic Applied Services in the Cyber Space’ Bill”. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 13(4), pp. 19–39. [In Persian].
Ghorbanian, M., Ghahramani, M., and Abolghasemi, M. (2021). “Identifying the Components of Good Governance in Iranian Higher Education System”. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 17(1), pp. 53–82. doi:10.22051/jontoe.2020.31217.3037. [In Persian].
Huynh-Quan-Suu, C. (2007). Étymologie du terme “gouvernance”. Service de Traduction de l’Union Européenne.
Hyden, G., Mease, K., Foresti, M., and Fritz, V. (2008). Governance assessments for local stakeholders: What the World Governance Assessment offers (Working Paper 287). Overseas Development Institute. https://media.odi.org/documents/822.pdf
ITU. (2021). Global cybersecurity index 2020: Measuring commitment to cybersecurity. International Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/global-cybersecurity-index.aspx
ITU. (2024). ICT Regulatory Tracker: Methodology. https://app.gen5.digital/tracker/about
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). World Bank.
Karanjam, S. S., Seyed Javadin, S. R., Esfidani, M., and Alimohammadlou, M. (2022). “Designing a mental cognitive mapping model using the Zaltman metaphorical extraction technique (ZMET)”. New Media Studies, 8(32), pp. 97–153. doi:10.22054/nms.2022.67202.1381. [In Persian].
Legatum Institute. (2023). Prosperity Index: The 2023 Legatum Prosperity Index. Available on www.prosperity.com
Mohammad Hosaini, E. (2021). “Regulation of and by Platforms (The challenge of cyberspace legislation; who is responsible for publishing inappropriate content)”. Society Culture Media, 10(39), pp. 245–260. [In Persian].
Mohey, D., and Eldin, M. H. (2016). “A survey on sentiment analysis challenge”. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 30(4), pp. 330–338.
Najafpour Aghabeighlou, A., Parsania, H., and Eslami Tanha, A. A. (2021). “Virtual utopia: Theoretical framework of cyberspace governance in the Islamic Republic”. Religion and Communication, 28(1), pp. 305–330. doi:10.30497/rc.2021.75821. [In Persian].
Naficy, A., Haddadi, A., and Ganji Azad, A. (2025). Tare natarz: A report on the state of balance in cyberspace governance in Iran. Hokmrani Publishing. [In Persian].
Nikokhesal, T., Erfaniankhanzadeh, H., and Ahmadi, M. (2023). “Presenting a conceptual model of security governance of internal messaging social networks”. Protective & Security Researches, 11(42), pp. 155–180. [In Persian].
OECD, European Union, and EC-JRC. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing.
Portulans Institute. (2023). The network readiness index 2023: Iran, Islamic Rep. https://networkreadinessindex.org/country/iran-islamic-republic-of/
Rasouli, H., Hasanzadeh, M., and Rahimian, S. (2023). “Presenting an ontology model of cyberspace sovereignty: In order to provide a comprehensive definition”. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 39(2), pp. 425–452. doi: 10.22034/jipm.2023.706799[In Persian].
Rohani, A., and Rohani, M. (2024). “The role of cyberspace in the national governance of the Islamic Republic of Iran”. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 13(53), pp. 61–84. [In Persian].
Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., and Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the environmental footprint. Publications Office of the European Union.
Soheili Moghadam, S. M. (2020). “Examining government sovereignty in cyberspace; A case study of Saudi Arabia in the face of opposition”. Journal of Islamic Awakening Studies, 9(1), pp. 281–309. [In Persian].
Sridhar, V. (2019). Emerging ICT policies and regulations: Roadmap to digital economies. Springer Nature Singapore.
Tabibi, M., Hosseini, A., and Rezaei, T. (2015). “Evaluating the good urban governance indexes in tourist destination cities, using IPA method (Case study: Tonekabon)”. Urban Tourism, 2(3), pp. 219–231. doi:10.22059/jut.2015.58444. [In Persian].
Taghipoor Javi, A., and Barimani, F. (2023). “Assessing the groundwater governance in critical forbidden plains of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province (Emphasizing the effectiveness principle of OECD)”. Iran-Water Resources Research, 19(3), pp. 57–78. [In Persian].
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations. https://publicadministration.desa.un.org/
World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank.
Wiedemann, G. (2016). Text mining for qualitative data analysis in the social sciences. Springer.
سیاست نامه علم و فناوری
دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 54
اردیبهشت 1405
صفحه 127-151

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 16 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 27 اسفند 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار