1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Ritala, P. (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23–36.
2. Agarwal, A., Gans, J., and Goldfarb, A. (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
3. Alaassar, A., Mention, A.-L., and Aas, T.H. (2020) Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators: the case of regulatory sandboxes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techf ore.2020.120257.
4. Alaimo, C. (2021) From people to objects: the digital transformation of fields. Organization Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708 40621 1030654.
5. Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Cronin, M.A., and Paiva, A. (2020) Creativity encounters between children and robots. In: Belpaeme, T. and Young, J. (eds), HRI ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. . New York, NY: ACM Press. pp. 379–388.
6. Amabile, T. (2019) Creativity, artificial intelligence, and a world of surprises. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0075.
7. An, J., Kim, K., Mortara, L., and Lee, S. (2018) Deriving technology intelligence from patents: preposition-based semantic analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 1, 217–236.
8. Andersson Schwarz, J. (2017) Platform logic: an interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy & Internet, 9, 4, 374–394.
9. Asheim, B.T. and Coenen, L. (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34, 8, 1173–1190.
10. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L.D., and Wright, M.(2018) Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 1, 72–95.
11. Baccarella, C.V., Wagner, T.F., Kietzmann, J.H., and McCarthy, I.P. (2018) Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. European Management Journal, 36, 4, 431–438.
12. Balachandran, S. and Hernandez, E. (2019) Do institutional reforms perpetuate or mitigate the Matthew effect? Intellectual property rights and access to international alliances. Strategy Science, 4, 2, 151–174.
13. Bandura, A. (1985) Model of causality in social learning theory. In: Mahoney, M.J. and Freeman, A. (eds), Cognition and Psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 81–99.
14. Baptista, J., Stein, M.K., Klein, S., Watson-Manheim, M.B., and Lee, J. (2020) Digital work and organizational transformation: emergent digital/human work configurations in modern organisations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2), 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101618.
15. Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W.J., and Yates, J.(2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organization Science, 23, 5, 1448–1466.
16. Beane, M. (2019) Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 1, 87–123.
17. Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M.L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A.P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., Fecher, B., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Grimpe, C., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Heigl, F., Hoisl, K., Hyslop, K., Kokshagina, O., LaFlamme, M., Lawson, C., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Lukas, W., Nordberg, M., Norn, M.T., Poetz, M., Ponti, M., Pruschak, G., Pujol Priego, L., Radziwon, A., Rafner, J., Romanova, G., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S.K., Sherson, J.F., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C.L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J.B., Velden, T., Verganti, R., Wareham, J.,Wiggins, A., and Xu, S.M. (2020) The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualization approach. Industry and Innovation, 136–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662 716.2020.1792274.
18. Beck, S., LaFlamme, M., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M.-L., Crowston, K., Di Marco, D., Effert, A., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Hoisl, K., Kokshagina, O., Norn, M.-T., Poetz, M., Pruschak, G., Pujol Priego, L., Radziwon, A., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S.K., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C.L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J.B., Verganti, R., Wareham, J., and Xu, S.M. (2021) Examining Open Innovation in Science (OIS): what Open Innovation can and cannot offer the science of science. Innovation, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1999248.
19. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., and Tanaka, F. (2018) Social robots for education: a review. Science Robotics, 3, 21, eaat5954. https://doi. org/10.1126/sciro botics.aat5954.
20. Bessen, J.E., Denk, E., Kim, J., and Righi, C. (2020) Declining Industrial Disruption. Boston University School of Law. Law and Economics Research Paper.Available at: https://schol arship.law.bu.edu/facul ty_schol arshi p/982/ [Accessed 6 July 2021].
21. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., and Venkatraman, A. (2013) Digital business strategy: towards a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2, 471–482.
22. Bitektine, A. (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 1, 151–179.
23. Björkdahl, J. (2020) Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms. California Management Review, 62, 4, 17–36.
24. Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K.,Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M.G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I.P., Moeslein, K.M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F.T., Radziwon, A., Rossi-Lamastra, C., Sims, J., and Ter Wal, A.L.J. (2017) The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 1, 8–40.
25. Bradley, C. and O’Toole, C. (2016) An incumbent’s guide to digital disruption. McKinsey Quarterly. Available at: https://www.mckin sey.com/busin ess-funct ions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/an-incumbents-guide-to-digital-disruption [Accessed 6 July 2021].
26. Brem, A. and Nylund, P.A. (2021) Maneuvering the bumps in the New Silk Road: open innovation, technological complexity, dominant design, and the international impact of Chinese innovation. R&D Management, 51, 3,239–308.
27. Brem, A. and Radziwon, A. (2017) Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects: a case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 130–141.
28. Brem, A., Viardot, E., and Nylund, P.A. (2020) Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: which technologies will improve our lives? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techf ore.2020.120451.
29. Breslin, D. (2011) Reviewing a generalized Darwinist approach to studying socioeconomic change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 2, 218–235.
30. Brynjolfsson, E. and Mitchell, T. (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce Implications. Science, 358,6370, 1530–1534.
31. Cacciotti, G., Hayton, J.C., Mitchell, J.R., and Giazitzoglu, A. (2016) A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 3,302–325.
32. Carnevale, J.B. and Hatak, I. (2020) Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187.
33. Cennamo, C., Dagnino, G.B., Di Minin, A., and Lanzolla,G. (2020) Managing digital transformation: scope of transformation and modalities of value co-generation and delivery. California Management Review, 62, 4, 5–16.
34. Cennamo, C. and Santaló, J. (2019) Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30, 3, 617–641.
35. Chakravorti, B., Bhalla, A., and Chaturvedi, R.S. (2017) 60 countries’ digital competitiveness, indexed. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2017/07/60-countries-digital-competitiveness-indexed [Accessed 6 July 2021].
36. Chen, Y., Pereira, I., and Patel, P.C. (2021) Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management, 47, 5, 1305–1337.
37. Chesbrough, H.W. (2020) Enel X: driving digital transformation in the energy sector. Harvard Business School Case Studies. Available at: https://store.hbr.org/product/enel-x-driving-digital-transforma tion-in-the-energy-sector/B5957 [Accessed 6 July 2021].
38. Chesbrough, H.W., Heaton, S., and Mei, L. (2020) Open innovation with Chinese characteristics: a dynamic capabilities perspective. R&D Management, 51, 3, 247–259.
39. Chesbrough, H.W., Lettl, C., and Ritter, T. (2018) Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35, 6, 930–938.
40. Coad, A., Nightingale, P., Stilgoe, J., and Vezzani, A.(2021) Editorial: the dark side of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 28, 1, 102–112.
41. Cobben, D.Y.P., Ooms, W.M., Roijakkers, A.H.W.M., and Radziwon, A. (2021) Ecosystem types: a systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–164.
42. Collinson, S. and Liu, Y. (2019) Recombination for innovation: performance outcomes from international partnerships in China. R&D Management, 49(1), 46–63.
43. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., and Zampieri, R. (2019) The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938.
44. Cross, E.S., Liepelt, R., de C. Hamilton, A.F., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., and Prinz, W. (2012) Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 9, 2238–2254.
45. Cusumano, M.A., Gawer, A., and Yoffie, D.B. (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. New York, NY: Harper Business.
46. Cutolo, D. and Kenney, M. (2019) Dependent Entrepreneurs in a Platform Economy: Playing in the Gardens of the Gods. Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy Working Paper 3. Available at: https://ucanr.edu/sites/ PSU/files/ 349051.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2021].
47. Dąbrowska, J., Lopez-Vega,H., and Ritala, P. (2019) Waking the sleeping beauty: Swarovski’s open innovation journey. R&D Management, 49, 5, 775–788.
48. Dattée, B., Alexy, O., and Autio, E. (2018) Maneuvering in poor visibility: how firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 2, 466–498.
49. Davenport, T. and Redman, T. (2020) Digital transformation comes down to talent in four key areas. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/05/digit al-transforma tion-comes-down-to-talent-in-4-key-areas [Accessed 6 July 2021].
50. De Marco, C., Di Minin, A., Marullo, C., and Nepelski, D.(2019) Digital Platform Innovation in European SMEs an Analysis of SME Instrument Business Proposals and Case Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/57240.
51. De Mauro, A., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., and Ritala, P.(2018) Human resources for big data professions: a systematic classification of job roles and required skill sets. Information Processing & Management, 54, 5, 807–817.
52. Del Vecchio, P., Di Minin, A., Petruzzelli, A.M., Panniello, U., and Pirri, S. (2018) Big data for open innovation in SMEs and large corporations: trends, opportunities, and challenges. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(1), 6–22.
53. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., and Van Aken, J.E. (2008) Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29, 393–413.
54. Di Minin, A. and Faems, D. (2013) Building appropriation advantage: an introduction to the special issue on intellectual property management. California Management Review, 55, 4, 7–14.
55. Diaz-Rainey, I., Ibikunle, G., and Mention, A.L. (2015) The technological transformation of capital markets. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 99, 277–284.
56. Dougherty, D. and Dunne, D.D. (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23, 5, 1467–1484.
57. Dremel, C., Wulf, J., Herterich, M.M., Waizmann, J.C., and Brenner, W. (2017) How AUDI AG established big data analytics in its digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16, 2, 81–100.
58. Dumouchel, P. and Damiano, L. (2017) Living with Robots.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Ekbia, H., Mattioli, M., Kouper, I., Arave, G., Ghazinejad,A., Bowman, T., Suri, V.R., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., and Sugimoto, C.R. (2015) Big data, bigger dilemmas: critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 8, 1523–1545.
60. Enkel, E., Bogers, M., and Chesbrough, H. (2020) Exploring open innovation in the digital age: a maturity model and future research directions. R&D Management, 50, 1, 161–168.
61. European Commission. (2018, 26 April) Online Platforms:Commission Sets New Standards on Transparency and Fairness. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commi ssion/press corne r/detai l/en/IP_18_3372 [Accessed 6 July 2021].
62. Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., and Sayegh, K. (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28, 1, 62–70.
63. Ferras-Hernandez, X. and Nylund, P.A. (2019) Clusters as innovation engines: the accelerating strengths of proximity. European Management Review, 16, 1,37–53.
64. Fjeldstad, Ø.D., Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E., and Lettl, C. (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 6, 734–750.
65. Fleming, P. (2017) The human capital hoax: work, debt and insecurity in the era of uberization. Organization Studies, 38, 5, 691–709.
66. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., and Dautenhahn, K. (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 3, 143–166.
67. Ford, M. (2015) Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York, NY: Basic Books.
68. Frankiewicz, B. and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020) Digital transformation is about talent, not technology. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/05/digit al-transforma tion-is-about-talent-not-technology [Accessed 6 July 2021].
69. Friedman, B. (1996) Value-sensitive design. ACM Interactions, 3, 6, 16–23.
70. Fuchs, C. (2010) StudiVZ: social networking in the surveillance society. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 2, 171–185.
71. Garud, R., Dunbar, R.L., and Bartel, C.A. (2011) Dealing with unusual experiences: a narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organization Science, 22, 3, 587–601.
72. Garud, R. and Karunakaran, A. (2018) Process-based ideology of participative experimentation to foster identity-challenging innovations: the case of Gmail and AdSense. Strategic Organization, 16, 3, 273–303.
73. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1, 775–819.
74. Gawer, A. (2020) Digital platforms’ boundaries: the interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045.
75. Geels, F.W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 8–9, 1257–1274.
76. Geels, F.W. and Schot, J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 3, 399–417.
77. Gibson, C.B. and Birkinshaw, J. (2004) The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 2, 209–226.
78. Gregory, R.W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., and Kyriakou, H. (2020) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Academy of Management Review, 46, 3, 534–551.https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2019.0178.
79. Haarla, A., Hakala, H., and O’Shea, G. (2018) Re-imagining the forest: entrepreneurial ecosystem development for Finnish cellulosic materials. In: Leitão, J., Alves, H., Krueger, N. and Park, J. (eds), Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems. Cham: Springer, pp. 191–214.
80. Hakala, H., O’Shea, G., Farny, S., and Luoto, S. (2020) Re-storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts: the model-narrative review method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22, 1, 10–32.
81. Hakala, H. and Vuorinen, T. (2020) Tools for Strategy: A Starter Kit for Academics and Practitioners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., and Antunes, C. (2020) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58, 5, 1159–1197.
83. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., and Wiesböck, F. (2016) Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15, 2, 123–139.
84. Hill, S. (2015) Raw Deal: How the “Uber Economy” and Runaway Capitalism are Screwing American Workers. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
85. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2014) Wandel von Produktionsarbeit –“ Industrie 4.0”. WSI-Mitteilungen,67, 6, 421–429.
86. Ilvonen, I., Thalmann, S., Manhart, M., and Sillaber, C. (2018) Reconciling digital transformation and knowledge protection: a research agenda. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16, 2, 235–244.
87. Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A. (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 8, 2255–2276.
88. Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., and Ritala, P. (2018) Organization of knowledge ecosystems: prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 47, 8, 1523–1537.
89. Jirotka, M., Grimpe, B., Stahl, B., Eden, G., and Hartswood, M. (2017) Responsible research and innovation in the digital age. Communications of the ACM, 60, 5, 62–68.
90. Jones, C.I. and Tonetti, C. (2020) Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review, 110, 9, 2819–2858.
91. Kahn, P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B.T., Shen, S., Ruckert, J.H., and Gary, H.E. (2016) Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 173–180.
92. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., and Marton, A. (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2, 357–370.
93. Karhu, K. and Ritala, P. (2020) Slicing the cake without baking it: opportunistic platform entry strategies in digital markets. Long Range Planning, 54, 101988.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101988.
94. Karimi, J. and Walter, Z. (2015) The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: a factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 1, 39–81.
95. Kellogg, K.C., Valentine, M.A., and Christin, A. (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 1, 366–410.
96. Kenney, M. and Zysman, J. (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32, 3, 61–69.
97. Kerr, C., Farrukh, C., Phaal, R., and Probert, D. (2013) Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 6, 1050–1070.
98. Kerr, C., Phaal, R., and Probert, D. (2012) Cogitate, articulate, communicate: the psychosocial reality of technology roadmapping and roadmaps. R&D Management, 42, 1, 1–13.
99. Kohli, R. and Johnson, S. (2011) Digital transformation in latecomer industries: CIO and CEO leadership lessons from Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10, 4, article 3. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/ vol10/ iss4/3 [Accessed 6 July 2021].
100. Konradt, U., Warszta, T., and Ellwart, T. (2013) Fairness perceptions in web-based selection: impact on applicants’ pursuit intentions, recommendation intentions, and intentions to reapply. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 2, 155–169.
101. Kostis, A. and Ritala, P. (2020) Digital artifacts in industrial co-creation: how to use VR technology to bridge the provider-customer boundary. California Management Review, 36, 4, 125–147.
102. Kudina, O. (2019) The Technological Mediation of Morality: Value Dynamism, and the Complex Interaction Between Ethics and Technology [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3990/1.97890 36547444 [Accessed 6 July 2021].
103. Kudyba, S. (2020) COVID-19 and the acceleration of digital transformation and the future of work. Information Systems Management, 37, 4, 284–287.
104. Kummer, T.F., Recker, J., and Bick, M. (2017) Technology-induced anxiety: manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals. Information & Management, 54, 1, 73–89.
105. Kunisch, S., Menz, M., and Langan, R. (2020) Chief digital officers: an exploratory analysis of their emergence, nature, and determinants. Long Range Planning, 2020, 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101999.
106. Lanzolla, G., Lorenz, A., Miron-Spektor, E., Schilling, M., Solinas, G., and Tucci, C.L. (2020) Digital transformation: what is new if anything? Emerging patterns and management research. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 3, 341–350.
107. Lee, K.F. (2018) AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
108. Liang, F., Das, V., Kostyuk, N., and Hussain, M.M. (2018) Constructing a data-driven society: China’s social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy and Internet, 10, 4, 415–453.
109. Lindebaum, D., Vesa, M., and den Hond, F. (2020) Insights from “the machine stops” to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision making and its implications for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 45, 1, 247–263.
110. Longin, L., and Deroy, O. (2022) Augmenting perception: How artificial intelligence transforms sensory substitution. Consciousness and Cognition, 99, 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103280.
111. Mäenpää, H., Mäkinen, S., Kilamo, T., Mikkonen, T.,Männistö, T., and Ritala, P. (2018) Organizing for openness: six models for developer involvement in hybrid OSS projects. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 9, 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0088-1.
112. Maijanen, P. and Virta, S. (2017) Managing exploration and exploitation in a media organization: a capability-based approach to ambidexterity. Journal of Media Business Studies, 14, 2, 146–165.
113. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., and Marrs, A. (2013) Disruptive Technologies: Advances that Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: https://www.mckin sey.com/busin ess-functions/digit al-mckinsey/our-insights/disru ptive -technologies [Accessed 6 July 2021].
114. March, J.G. (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
115. Marsh, E., Vallejos, E.P., and Spence, A. (2021) The digital workplace and its dark side: an integrative review. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 107118.
116. Martin, C.J. (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149–159.
117. Mention, A.L. (2019) Digital Innovation: Harnessing the Value of Open Data. Singapore: World Scientific.
118. Mention, A.L., Barlatier, P.J., and Josserand, E. (2019) Using social media to leverage and develop dynamic capabilities for innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 144, 242–250.
119. Mortara, L. (2015) Communicating Intelligence. Centre for Technology Management Working Paper Series 7. Available at. https://www2.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploa ds/Resea rch/CTM/worki ng_paper/ 2015-07-Mortara.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2021].
120. Nadkarni, S. and Prügl, R. (2020) Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 233–341.
121. Nambisan, S. (2017) Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 6, 1029–1055.
122. Nambisan, S., Zahra, S.A., and Luo, Y. (2019) Global platforms and ecosystems: implications for international business theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 9, 1464–1486.
123. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124. Nørskov, M. (2021) Robotification and ethical cleansing. AI & Society, 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/s0014 6-021-01203-2.
125. Nørskov, M. and Nørskov, S. (2020) Social robots and recognition. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 1, 5–8.
126. Nørskov, S. and Ulhøi, J.P. (2020) The use of robots in job interviews. In: Fisher, S. and Bondarouk, T. (eds), Encyclopedia of Electronic HRM. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 208–213.
127. Nylund, P.A., Brem, A., and Agarwal, N. (2021) Innovation ecosystems for meeting sustainable development goals: the evolving roles of multinational enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclep ro.2020.125329.
128. O’Reilly, C.A. and Tushman, M.L. (2016) Lead and Disrupt: How to Solve the Innovator’s Dilemma. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
129. O’Shea, G., Farny, S., and Hakala, H. (2019) The buzz before business: a design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 56, 3, 1097–1120.
130. Oreg, S., Bartunek, J.M., Lee, G., and Do, B. (2018) An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review, 43, 1, 65–86.
131. Orlikowski, W.J. (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 1, 63–92.
132. Otto, B. and Jarke, M. (2019) Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case. Electronic Markets, 29, 4, 561–580.https://doi.org/10.1007/s1252 5-019-00362 -x.
133. Pagani, M. and Pardo, C. (2017) The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 185–192.
134. Petricevic, O. and Teece, D.J. (2019) The structural reshaping of globalization: implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 9,1487–1512.
135. Pisano, G. and Teece, D. (1989) Collaborative arrangements and global technology strategy: some evidence from the telecommunications equipment industry. In: Rosenbloom, R. and Burgelman, R. (eds), Research on Technology Innovation, Management & Policy, Vol. 4, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 145–174.
136. Radziwon, A., Bogers, M., and Bilber, A. (2017) Creating and capturing value in a regional innovation ecosystem: a study of how manufacturing SMEs develop collaborative solutions. International Journal of Technology Management, 75, 1, 73–96.
137. Radziwon, A., Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., and Minssen, T. (2021) Ecosystem effectuation: creating new value through open innovation during a pandemic. R&D Management, forthcoming.
138. Rauch, E., Linder, C., and Dallasega, P. (2020) Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.018.
139. Ritala, P., Baiyere, A., Hughes, M., and Kraus, S. (2021) Digital strategy implementation: the role of individual entrepreneurial orientation and relational capital. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 171, 120961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120961.
140. Ritala, P., Golnam, A., and Wegmann, A. (2014) Coopetition-based business models: the case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 2, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indma rman.2013.11.005.
141. Rogers, D.L. (2016) The Digital Transformation Playbook:Rethink your Business for the Digital Age. New York,NY: Columbia University Press.
142. Rong, K., Lin, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., and Radziwon, A.(2020) Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: an empirical study in China. Industry and Innovation, 28,5, 545–569.
143. Saldanha, T. (2019) Why Digital Transformations Fail:The Surprising Disciplines of How to Take Off and Stay Ahead. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
144. Saygin, A.P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., and Frith, C. (2012) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 4, 413–422.
145. Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S., and Smith, W.K. (2016) Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10,1, 5–64.
146. Sebastian, I., Ross, J., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K., and Fonstad, N. (2017) How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16, 3, 197–213.
147. Sebo, S., Stoll, B., Scassellati, B., and Jung, M.F. (2020) Robots in groups and teams: a literature revie. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, CSCW2, Article 176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415247.
148. Seibt, J., Damholdt, M.F., and Vestergaard, C. (2018) Five principles of integrative social robotics. In: Coeckelberg, M., Loh, J., Funk, M., Seibt, J., and Nørskov, M.(eds), Envisioning Robots in Society –Power,Politics,and Public Space: Proceedings of Robophilosophy. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 28–42.
149. Selander, L. and Jarvenpaa, S.L. (2020) Xenografting in political activism: logics co-existence supported by resource injections. Academy of Management Discoveries, 20, 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0052.
150. Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., and Joglekar, S. (2013) Leveraging digital technologies: how information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2, 565–590.
151. Shipilov, A. and Gawer, A. (2020) Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 1, 92–121.
152. Singh, A. and Hess, T. (2017) How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16, 1, 1–17.
153. Singh, A., Klarner, P., and Hess, T. (2020) How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters. Long Range Planning, 53, 3, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.07.001.
154. Solberg, E., Traavik, L.E.M., and Wong, S.I. (2020) Digital mindsets: recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review, 62, 4, 105–124.
155. Song, A.K. (2019) The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem: a critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics, 53, 569–590. Soto-Acosta, P. (2020) Covid-19 pandemic: shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear. Information Systems Management, 37, 260–266.
156. Tennent, H., Shen, S., and Jung, M. (2019) Micbot: a peripheral robotic object to shape conversational dynamics and team performance. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’19). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp.133–142.
157. Thomas, L.D. and Autio, E. (2020) Innovation ecosystems in management: an organizing typology. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref ore/9780190224 851.013.203.
158. Thomas, L.D., Autio, E., and Gann, D.M. (2014) Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 2, 198–219.
159. Thomas, L.D. and Ritala, P. (2021) Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: a collective action view. Journal of Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320 986617.
160. Traeger, M.L., Strohkorb Sebo, S., Jung, M., Scassellati, B., and Christakis, N.A. (2020) Vulnerable robots positively shape human conversational dynamics in a human–robot team. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 12, 6370–6375.
161. Tripsas, M. (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”. Organization Science, 20, 2, 441–460.
162. Tumbas, S., Berente, N., and Brocke, J.V. (2018) Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. Journal of Information Technology, 33, 3, 188–202.
163. Ulhøi, J. and Nørskov, S. (2020) Extending the conceptualization of performability with cultural sustainability: the case of social robotics. In: Misra, K.B. (ed.), Handbook of Advanced Performability Engineering. Berlin: Springer, pp. 89–104.
164. Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., and Frattini, F.(2020) The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis. R&D Management, 50, 1, 136–160.
165. Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P.,Farina Briamonte, M., and Orlando, B. (2021) Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 133, 327–336.
166. Van Burg, E. and Romme, A.G.L. (2014) Creating the future together: toward a framework for research synthesis in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 2, 369–397.
167. Van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., and Romme, A.G.L.(2012) Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: evidence from a field study. R&D Management, 42, 2, 150–169.
168. Verbeek, P.P. (2015) Toward a theory of technological mediation: a program for postphenomenological research. In: Berg, J.K., Friis, O., and Crease, R.P. (eds), Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 189–205.
169. Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., and Haenlein, M. (2021) Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
170. Vial, G. (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 2, 118–144.
171. Wang, W. and Siau, K. (2019) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, robotics, future of work and future of humanity: a review and research agenda. Journal of Database Management, 30, 1, 61–79.
172. Wessel, L.K., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J.,and Jensen, T. (2020) Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of Association of Information Systems, 22, 1, 102–129.
173. Witt, J.K. (2011) Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 3, 201–206.
174. Xu, G., Wu, Y., Minshall, T., and Zhou, Y. (2018) Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: a case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136,208–221.
175. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21, 4, 724–735.
176. Zhai, K., Yang, Y., and Zhu, J. (2020) Exclusive: China would rather see TikTok U.S. close than a forced sale. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reute rs.com/artic le/us-china-bytedance-tiktok-exclusive-idUSKBN2622L6 [Accessed 6 July 2021].
177. Zhang, M. and Merchant, H. (2020) A causal analysis of the role of institutions and organizational proficiencies on the innovation capability of Chinese SMEs.International Business Review, 29, 2, 101638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusr ev.2019.101638.
178. Zuboff, S. (2020) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
