بررسی اخلاقی عملکرد دو سامانه هوش مصنوعی تشخیص چهره و تصمیم‌گیری خودکار با تکیه بر حکمت عملی صدرایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسنده

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

این مقاله با هدف بررسی چالش‌های اخلاقی دو سامانه هوش مصنوعی «تشخیص چهره» و «تصمیم‌گیری خودکار» نگاشته شده است. روش تحقیق به‌کاررفته، تحلیل محتوا است که از طریق آن، نحوه عملکرد این سامانه‌ها و نقض اصول اخلاقی توسط آن‌ها مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. اصول اخلاقی نقض‌شده شامل «انصاف»، «آزادی و اختیار»، «حریم خصوصی و حفظ اسرار»، «مسئولیت‌پذیری و پاسخ‌گویی» و «عمل به ظن معتبر» است. در ادامه، این اصول در چارچوب حکمت عملی صدرایی مورد تحلیل قرار می‌گیرند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که در حکمت صدرایی، «انصاف» از صفات ضروری حاکم است و رعایت بی‌طرفی الزامی است؛ «آزادی و اختیار» برای تکامل و سعادت انسان اساسی است؛ «حریم خصوصی» اهمیت ویژه‌ای دارد و تجسس در آن ناپسند است؛ «مسئولیت‌پذیری و پاسخ‌گویی» از ویژگی‌های لازم رهبران است؛ و «عمل به ظن غیرمعتبر» قبیح شمرده می‌شود. بنابراین، براساس حکمت عملی صدرایی، به‌کارگیری این دو سامانه در شکل کنونی خود اخلاقاً قابل قبول نیست، مگر آنکه در طراحی یا اجرای آن‌ها تغییراتی صورت گیرد تا چالش‌های اخلاقی مذکور برطرف شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Ethical review of the performance of two artificial intelligence systems: face recognition and automated decision-making systems based on Sadrai's practical wisdom

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Sajjad Zare Mirakabad
دانشگاه تهران
چکیده [English]

This paper is written with the aim of examining the ethical challenges of two artificial intelligence systems: "Face Recognition" and "Automated Decision-Making." The research method employed is content analysis, through which the operation of these systems and their violation of ethical principles are investigated. The violated ethical principles include "Fairness," "Freedom and Autonomy," "Privacy and Confidentiality," "Accountability and Responsibility," and "Acting on Reliable Assumptions." Subsequently, these principles are analyzed within the framework of Sadr-al-Muta'ali's practical wisdom. The results indicate that in Sadr-al-Muta'ali's wisdom, "Fairness" is an essential attribute of the ruler, and maintaining impartiality is mandatory; "Freedom and Autonomy" are fundamental for human development and happiness; "Privacy" holds special importance, and intrusions into it are deemed undesirable; "Accountability and Responsibility" are necessary characteristics of leaders; and "Acting on Unreliable Assumptions" is considered reprehensible. Therefore, based on Sadr-al-Muta'ali's practical wisdom, the implementation of these two systems in their current form is ethically unacceptable unless modifications are made in their design or implementation to address the aforementioned ethical challenges.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethics of artificial intelligence
  • Sadrai's practical wisdom
  • fairness
  • freedom
  • privacy
Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Boquen, A. (2020). “An Introduction to China’s Social Corporate Credit System”. Retrieved from New Horizons: https://nhglobalpartners.com/chinas-social-credit-system-explained/
Bowyer, K. (2004). Face Recognition Technology: Security Versus Privacy. IEEE.
Doshi-Velez, F., and Kim, B. (2017). “Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning”.
European Commission. (2020). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust. European Union.
Gilpin, L. H. (2018). “Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning”. IEEE.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MI
Harris, J., and Davenport, T. (2005).“ Automated Decision Making Comes of Age”. Accenture.
IEEE. (2019). “Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems”.
Jain, A. K., Ross, A., and Nandakumar, K. (2011). Introduction to Biometrics. Springer Science and Business Media.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., and Vayena, E. (2019). “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines”. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), pp. 389–399.
Katebi, A. N. (1874). Hikmat al-'Ain and its commentary. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University.
Khalili, M. (2019). “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence at Google”. Tehran: National Cyberspace Center.{In Persian}
Khodaghalizadeh, B. (2020). “Translation of the 2018 Report of the AI Now Institute”. Tehran: National Cyberspace Center. {In Persian}
Kolayni, M. (2028). Al-Kafi. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub Al-Islamiyyah.
Kostka, G. (2019). “China’s social Credit Systems and Public Opinion: Explaining High Levels of Approval”. Sage.
Kuziemski, M., and Misuraca, G. (2020). “AI Governance in the Public Sector: Three Tales from the Frontiers of Automated Decision-Making in Democratic Settings”. Elsevier - Telecommunications Policy.
Lakzai, N. (2004). “Ethical Politics in the Thought of Mulla Sadra”. Political Science Studies, 1(1), pp. 45-67. {In Persian}
Li, X., and Zhang, T. (2017). “An exploration on Artificial Intelligence Application: From Security, Privacy and Ethic Perspective”. IEEE.
Metvadi, H. (2018). “Conceptualizing Human Privacy in the Quran and Hadith”. Quranic Sciences and Teachings, pp. 9-23. {In Persian}
Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., and Floridi, L. (2016). “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate”. Big Data and Society, 3(2).
Nasr, S. H. (1997). “Three Muslim Sages: Avicenna, Suhrawardi, Ibn Arabi”. Oneworld Publications.
Noble, S. U. (2018). “Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism”. NYU Press.
OECD. (2021). OECD Recommendation on AI. [Online]. Available: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
O'Neil, C. (2016). “Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy”. Crown Publishing Group.
Richardson, R. (2021). “Defining and Demystifying Automated Decision Systems”. SSRN.
Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (2020). “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach”. Pearson.
Shirazi, S. M. (1972). Al-Mabda' wa Al-Ma'ad. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Wisdom and Philosophy.
Shirazi, S. M. (1981a). Al-Hikmah al-Muta'Aliyah Fi Al-Asfar al-'Aqliyyah al-Arba'ah. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath.
Shirazi, S. M. (1981b). Al-Shawahid al-Rububiyyah fi Al-Manahij Al-Sulukiyyah. Mashhad: Al-Markaz Al-Jami'i li Al-Nashr.
Shirazi, S. M. (1982). Tafseer Al-Quran Al-Kareem. Qom: Bidar.
Shirazi, S. M. (1984). Mafatih Al-Ghayb. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Research.
Shirazi, S. M. (1999). Al-Mazahir Al-Ilahiyyah Fi Asrar Al-‘Ulum Al-Kamaliyyah. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation.
Shirazi, S. M. (2004). Sharh Usul Al-Kafi. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research.
The Holy Quran.
Tusi, K. R. (2014). Introduction to the Political Philosophy of Mulla Sadra. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture. {In Persian}
Winfield, A. F., and Jirotka, M. (2018). “Ethical Governance is Essential to Building Trust in Robotics and AI Systems”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2133).