رشد و توسعۀ فناوری های پایدار: چارچوبی برای تحلیل حکمرانی نظام های نوآوری

نوع مقاله : ترجمه

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت اجرایی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

توسعه و انتشار نوآوری‎های فناورانه، برای کمک به اهداف اجتماعی مرتبط با پایداری، نیاز به حکمرانی دارند. با این حال، تعداد کمی از مطالعات به صورت نظام‎مند به انواع حکمرانی‎های به‎کار رفته و چگونگی تأثیر آنها بر توسعه و اشاعه نوآوری‎های فناورانه پایدار می‎پردازند. این مقاله بر اساس ادبیات علمی حوزه‎های حکمرانی، نظام نوآوری فناورانه و گذارهای اجتماعی ــ فنی، چارچوبی برای تحلیل نقش حکمرانی در نظام‎های نوآوری با هدف دستیابی به پایداری را عرضه می‎کند. ما پیش‎بینی می‎کنیم که مطالعات تجربی بر پایۀ این چارچوب به‎منزلۀ مسیرِ ورودی به فرآیندهای حکمرانی کمک خواهد کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Fostering sustainable technologies: a framework for analyzing the governance of innovation systems Karl Hillman, Mans Nilsson, Annika Richne and Thomas Magnusson.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naser Bagheri Moghaddam 1
  • Erfan Mosleh 2
 
منابع
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local “sticky”and global “ubiquitous” knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.
Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., Nauwelaers, C., & Tödtling, F. (2003). Regional Innovation Policy for Small+ Medium Enterprises. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Baker, S., & Eckerberg, K. (2008). In pursuit of sustainable development: new governance practices at the sub-national level in Europe. Routledge.
Bergek, A. (2002). Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2005). Analyzing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral innovation systems–a manual. In DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference (pp. 27–29). Citeseer.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. A. (2008). “Legitimation”and “development of positive externalities”: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592.
Carlsson, B., & Jacobsson, S. (1997). Diversity creation and technological systems: a technology policy perspective. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London, Pinter Publishers, 7.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93–118.
De Moor, K., Berte, K., De Marez, L., Joseph, W., Deryckere, T., & Martens, L. (2010). User-driven innovation? Challenges of user involvement in future technology analysis. Science and Public Policy, 37(1), 51–61.
Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation (Vol. 16). Springer Science & Business Media.
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fagerberg, J., C. Mowery, D., & R. Nelson, R. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 489–499.
Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
Geels, F. (2005). Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27(3), 363–397.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257–1274.
Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Mit Press.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.
Hey, C., Jacob, K., & Volkery, A. (2007). Better regulation by new governance hybrids? Governance models and the reform of European chemicals policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1859–1874.
Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2004). Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 815–849.
Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256–276.
Jordan, A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 17–33.
Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 249–266.
Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2003). Governance for sustainability through transition management. In Open Meeting of Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Montreal, Canada (pp. 16–18).
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.
Kleinman, D. L., Kinchy, A. J., & Autry, R. (2009). Local variation or global convergence in agricultural biotechnology policy? A comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 361–371.
Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2005). Compliance, communication and competition: patterns of EU environmental policy making and their impact on policy convergence. European Environment, 15(2), 114–128.
Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (1999). The transformation of governance in the European Union (Vol. 12). Psychology Press.
Leach, M., Bloom, G., Ely, A., Nightingale, P., Scoones, I., Shah, E., & Smith, A. (2007). Understanding governance: pathways to sustainability. STEPS Centre.
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity‐based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National innovation system: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.
Martin, M. J. C. (1994). Managing innovation and entrepreneurship in technology-based firms (Vol. 20). John Wiley & Sons.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford university press.
Newell, P. (2008). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 507–529.
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.
Nygaard, S. (2008). Co-evolution of technology, markets and institutions-the case of fuel cells and hydrogen technology in Europe. LU.
Olsen, J. P., & March, J. G. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
Oltra, V., & Jean, M. Saint. (2005). Environmental innovation and clean technology: an evolutionary framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(3), 153–172.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. Springer.
Raven, R. (2005). Strategic niche management for biomass.
Rip, A., Kemp, R., Rayner, S., & Malone, E. L. (1998). Human Choice and Climate Change. Technological Change. Battelle Press.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31.
Salter, B., & Salter, C. (2010). Governing innovation in the biomedicine knowledge economy: stem cell science in the USA. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 87–100.
Sandén, B. A., & Azar, C. (2005). Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy, 33(12), 1557–1576.
Sandén, B. A., Jacobsson, S., Palmblad, L., & Porsö, J. (2008). Assessment of the impact of a market formation programme on the Swedish PV innovation system. In DIME international conference on “Innovation, sustainability and policy”. Bordeaux (pp. 11–13). Citeseer.
Schot, J. (2001). Towards new forms of participatory technology development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(1), 39–52.
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.
Smith, A. (2003). Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: a role for alternative technology niches? Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 127–135.
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510.
Sterner, T. (2003). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Resources for the Future.
Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.
Voß, J.-P. (2007). Innovation processes in governance: the development of “emissions trading”as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), 329–343.