A Systematic Review of the Scientific Authority Realization Model Using Meta-Synthesis Method

The present study aimed to design a conceptual model for realizing scientific authority in Iran, using the method of metasynthesis and systematic review. The main question of the research is: "What is the model for realizing scientific authority and what components play a role in its formation?" In this regard, first 139 relevant Persian-language studies were identified and collected, and among them, 38 studies that had greater theoretical coherence and content relevance were analyzed in depth. The findings indicate that scientific authority is a multidimensional concept whose realization requires the simultaneous understanding and explanation of various components. Accordingly, eight categories including goals, dimensions, strategies, conditions and capacities, obstacles, consequences, evaluation indicators, and conceptual models were extracted and classified. In total, 7 macro-goals, 6 main dimensions, 28 institutional and structural capacities, 41 strategies, 19 barriers, 11 outcomes, and 53 evaluation indicators were identified as key components of scientific authority. The innovation of this research is in providing a comprehensive definition of scientific authority and developing a hybrid model based on qualitative analysis of previous research; a model that, by utilizing closed-loop logic, provides the possibility of feedback, modification, and continuous improvement of science and technology policies. The findings of this research can be used as a basis for promoting scientific governance and guiding policymaking in line with the realization of the strategic goals of the country's science and technology development.