Meta-synthesis of "soft technology"studies: moving towards a new approach to solving social and governance problems

Document Type : Promotional article


Department of Management and accounting - University of Allame Tabataba'I (ATU)


Changes in the social and managerial system in recent decades have been accompanied by an explosion of knowledge, softening of the economy and changes in values, based on which we need to redefine the concept of technology. Among the new approaches that have been proposed in the field of solving public problems is the concept of "soft technology", which requires a fundamental understanding of this field and knowledge of related research dimensions. The concept of governance and policy-making in different areas, under the influence of this kind of soft view, needs to be reviewed and changed, and in this regard, using these concepts, a new approach to solving social problems and governance can be presented. The purpose of this study is " Meta-synthesis of studies in order to identify theoretical and practical implications in the field of soft technology."In this regard, the method of documentary studies and Meta-synthesis was used and studies related to the field of "soft technology" were reviewed. Finally, in the summary section, theoretical implications in the epistemological, social and institutional axes and practical implications in the axes of soft social, political, economic, technological, fundamental and managerial components have been classified.


Main Subjects

Alipoor, A. (2019). “Soft Technologies Model in Islamic-Iranian Progress Model”. Iranian Pattern of Progress, 6(12), pp. 38-64. {In Persian}
Amber, C. (2014). An Illustrated Dictionary of Cyborg Anthropology. p. 9.
Babaii, S. (2020). “Borgmann's Philosophy of Technology: A Critical Review”. Philosophy of Science, 9(18), pp. 1-30. {In Persian}
‏Boromand, K., and Husseini, H. (2015). “Emancipation Of The Dominant Technology Space In Andrew Feinberg Critical Theory Of Technology”. Wisdom And Philosophy11(41), pp. 7-28. {In Persian}
Borumand, K., and Taqavi, M. (2012). “Analyzing Feenberg and Heidegger’s Attitude Towards Present Technological World”. Occidental Studies, 3(1), pp. 19-38. {In Persian}
Brandsen, T., Boogers, M., and Tops, P. (2006). “Soft Governance, Hard Consequences: The Ambiguous Status of Unofficial Guidelines –Enhancing Homeland Security from a Public Administration”. Public Administration Review, 66(4), pp. 546-553.
Byrne, J. M., and Rebovich, D. J. (2007). “The New Technology Of Crime, Law And Social Control”. NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Byrne, J., and Pattavina, A. (2007). Institutional Corrections and Soft Technology.
Danaei Fard, H. (2016). “Methodology Of Implication Studies In Social And Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches And Implementation Steps”. Journal of Methodology of Human Sciences, 22(86), pp. 39-71. {In Persian}
Dehghani Firoozabadi, S. J. (2011). “Power Technologies in Soft War”. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(51), pp. 5-30. {In Persian}
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. (2011). “From Game Design Elements To Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification"”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference. pp. 9–15.
Dobbins, M., and Knill, C. (2017). “Higher Education Governance In France, Germany, And Italy: Change And Variation In The Impact Of Transnational Soft Governance”. Policy and Society, 36, pp. 67 - 88.
Durand, T. and Dubreuil, M. (2001). “Humanizing The Future: Managing Change With Soft Technology”. Foresight, 3)4(, pp. 285-295.
Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Entezari, Y. (2004) “Innovative Economy: A New Model For Analysis And Policy Development Of Science, Technology And Innovation”. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 11(1), pp. 219-255. {In Persian}
Eslami, M. (2015). “Philosophizing About Technology: Why Should We Bother”. Tarjomaan. Available at: {In Persian}
Fadavi Bandegharaie, A., and Gramian, S. S. (2012). “Evolution of Soft Power Nature in The Postmodern Era”. Soft Power Studies, 1(3), pp. 77-104. {In Persian}
Fardanesh, H., and Jamshidi Tavana, A. (2015). “Philosophy of Technology, Approaches, Views and Erroneous Perceptions, an Explanation Of The Philosophy Of Educational Technology In The Present Era”. Technology of Education Journal, 9(4), pp. 279-286. {In Persian}
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaini, A., and Hosseinzadeh, A. (2011). “The Relationship Between Credits And Soft Technologies”. Humanities Methodology, 18(73), pp. 137-150. {In Persian}
Habermas, J. (1970). Technology and Science as Ideology. In Toward A Rational Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp. 81–122.
Habibi, A. (2019). SSM soft systems methodology. Parsmodir. Available at: {In Persian}
Harper, P. (1973). “Soft Technology’and Criticism Of The Western Model Of Development”. Prospects, 3(2), pp.183-192.
Hermansson, M., Ravne, R. (2005). “Fighting Social Engineering”. Availanle at: www.۲۸۱.pdf
Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy. How people make money from ideas. The Penguin Press.
Ille, F. R. (2009). “Building Chinese Global Brands Through Soft Technology Transfer”. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 2(1), pp. 47-61.
Iman, M. T. and Ghafarinasab, E. (2016). “A New Approach To The Social Construction Of New Technologies”. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(85), pp. 145-164. {In Persian}
Jensen, L.; Allen, M. (1996). “Meta- Synthesis Of Qualitative Findings”. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), pp. 553-560.
Jessop, B. (1997) “The Governance of Complexity And The Complexity Of Governance”. In A. Amin and J. Hausner (eds.), Beyond Markets and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Chelmsford: Edward Elgar, pp. 111-147.
Jessop, B. (1998). “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development”. International Social Science Journal, 155, pp. 29-46.
Kamali, Y. (2017). “The Methodology Of Meta Synthesis And Implications For Public Policy”. Political Quarterly, 47(3), pp. 721-736. {In Persian}
Knodt, M. (2019). “Multilevel Coordination in EU Energy Policy: A New Type of “Harder” Soft Governance?”. In Behnke, N., Broschek, J., and Sonnicksen, J. (Eds.), Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance, Palgrave Macmillan Cham, pp. 173-191.
Knodt, M., Ringel, M., and Müller, R. (2020). “‘Harder’ soft governance in the European Energy Union”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22, pp. 787-800.
Kordheydari, R., Mansouri Moayyed, F., and Khodadad Hoseini, H. (2019). “Metasynthesis of Factors Affecting to Develop Startups in New Technology-Based Firms in Entrepreneurial Ecosystem”. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 12(1), pp. 141-160. {In Persian}
Kuriyama, N. (2017). “The Transfer of Soft Technology”. In Japanese Human Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 145-162.
Long, S. (2002). Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems.
Long-ji, M. Q. G. H., and Liang, Y. (2005). “Redefining The Concept Of Soft-Technology [J]”. Science Research Management, 6.
Lynn, M. (2011). “Building Social Capital in the Digital Age of Civic Engagement”. Journal of Planning Literature.
Maggetti, M. (2015). “Hard and Soft Governance”. In Lynggaard, K., Manners, I., Löfgren, K. (eds) Research Methods in European Union Studies. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 
Malekifar, S., Ghazinoory, S. S., Ghaneirad, M. A., and Mousavi, A. (2018). “Identification And Analysis Of Current And Preferred Approaches National Cultural Industries Based On Stakeholders View”. Strategic Studies of public policy, 8(26), pp. 17-39. {In Persian}
Mehdiazdeh, M., and Tavakol, M. (2007). “Science and Technology Studies: A Review on Sociological Backgrounds of Technology”. Planning and Budgeting Journal, 12 (4), pp. 85-124. {In Persian}
Mobenidekordi, A., and Keshtkarhafanaki, M. (2016). “Transformation Of Social Innovation Models”. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 8(26), pp. 101-138. {In Persian}
Movahed Abtahi, S. (2010). “The Development Program as a Social Technology with a Philosophical Approach”. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(65), pp. 67-95. {In Persian}
Movahed Abtahi, S. M., and Donyavi, M. (2013). “Technology and Culture A Comparative Study of Paya and Mirbagheri Viewpoints”. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(73), pp. 85-109. {In Persian}
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Rushanara, A. and Sanders, B. )2007(. Social Innovation. What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford Said Business School Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, S., Manteghi, M., and Ghazinoory, S. S. (2015). “The Meta-Synthesis of Regional Innovation Models: A Review of 1990–2013”. Innovation Management Journal, 3(4), pp. 25-56. {In Persian}
Niemann, D., and Martens, K. (2018). “Soft Governance by Hard Fact? The OECD as A Knowledge Broker In Education Policy”. Global Social Policy, 18, pp. 267-283.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in World Politics Public Affairs. Cambrige MA: presueus publishing
Oberthür, S. (2019). “Hard or Soft Governance? The EU’s Climate and Energy Policy Framework for 2030”. Politics and Governance, 7, pp. 17-27.
OECD (2010). “Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation”. In SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
Rajabi, A. (2014). “Theoretical Foundations Of Information And Communication Technology Development And Its Application In The Sixth Five-Year Plan”. Majlis Research Center. {In Persian}
Rubles, M. )2012). “Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today's Workplace”. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), pp. 453–465.
Sadeqi Fasai, S., and Erfanmanesh, I. (2015). “Methodological Principles of Documentary Research in Social Sciences; Case of Study: Impacts of Modernization on Iranian Family”. Culture strategy, 8(29), pp. 61-91. {In Persian}
Safaei, B., Mosleh Shirazi, A. N., Mohamadi, A., and Alimohammadlou, M. (2018). “A Systematic Model for the Diffusion of Commercial Soft Technology in Iran’s Oil Industry”. Journal of Technology Development Management, 6(3), pp. 41-70. {In Persian}
Salmaninezhad, R., Azar, A., Moghbel, A., and Salehabadi, A. (2017). “Application of Soft Systems Methodology in Structuring Financing through Iran Capital Market, Case Study: Tehran Stock Exchange”. Researches of Management Organizational Resources, 7(1), pp. 65-88. {In Persian}
Sandelowski, M., and Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.‏
Sandelowski, M., and Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer
Schoenefeld, J., and Jordan, A. (2020). “Towards Harder Soft Governance? Monitoring Climate Policy in the EU”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22, pp. 774-786.
Sharifzadeh, R. (2015). “Technology, Agency and Decision”. Scientific Research Quarterly of Culture Strategy , 9(34), pp. 115-136. {In Persian}
Smits, D., and Hillegersberg, J. (2019). “Evaluation of the Usability Of A New ITG Instrument To Measure Hard And Soft Governance Maturity”. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7.
Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J. (2009). “Making Governance Networks Effective And Democratic Through Metagovernance”. Public Administration, 87, pp. 234-258.
Tabatabaeian, H., Sofi, B., and Bagheri, A. (2008). “Affecting Factors on Identifying and Selecting Soft Technology; SPR as a Case”. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 1(3), pp. 61-72. {In Persian}
Taghavi, M., and Golshani, M. (2012). “A Critical Review of Sharif' and Pitt's Models of Technology”. Journal of Management Improvement, 6(2), pp. 100-115. {In Persian}
Thaler, R., and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books.
Thaller, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W W Norton & Co.
Torfing, P., Sorensen, P. (2012). “Metagovernance: The art of governing interactive governance, Interactive GovernanceAdvancing the Paradigm”. In Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm, pp.122-144.
Trubek, D., Cottrell, M., and Nance, M. (2005) “‘Soft Law’, ‘Hard Law’, and European Integration: Toward a Theory of Hybridity”. University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1002.
UNCTAD (2008). “Creative Economy Report”. Available at:
Vermas, P., Crews, P., Poel, E., Furness, M., and Hawks, W. (2012). An approach in the philosophy of technology: from technical artifacts to technical social systems, Translated by Mustafa Taqvi and Farrokh Kakai, 2012. Tehran: Ame. {In Persian}
Zhouying, J. (2005). Global Technological Change: From Hard Technology to Soft Technology. Bristol.
Zhouying, J. )2004). “Technological Progress in History: A Survey of Evolution and Shift of Research Emphasis from ‘Hard-Tech’to ‘Soft-Tech’development”. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 3(2), pp.133-148.
Zimmer, L. (2006). “Qualitative Meta-Synthesis: A Question of Dialoguing with Texts.” Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 53(3), pp. 311-318.