An institutional theory investigation of U.S. technology development trends since the mid-19th century

Document Type : Translation


Research fellow at technology studies institute


Drawing on institutional theory, we examine how institutions have influenced technology development trends in the U.S. since the mid-19th century. Based on an inductive analysis of the history of technology development and corporate R&D, we show that both formal and informal institutional rules and constraints played a role in the initial rise of markets for technology, their decline during the early-20th century, and their eventual return at the end of the 20th century. We also find that formal and informal institutions influenced the widespread adoption of in-house R&D labs during the mid-20th century. Our study integrates insights from both the economics and sociology branches of institutional theory. This perspective is particularly useful to analyze historical phenomenon and shifts in trends across long time periods.


Akerlof, G.A., (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500.
Argyres, N., (1996(. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management Journal 17, 129–150.
Arora, A., Gambardella, A., )1990(. Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 361–379
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., Gambardella, A., )1999(. Markets for technology (Why do we see them, why don’t we see more of them, and why we should care). Heinz School of Public Policy and Management working paper. Carnegie Mellon University.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., Gambardella, A., )2001(. Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 419– 451.
Bain, J., (1992). The condition of entry and the public policy. In: High, J., Gable, W. (Eds.), A Century of the Sherman Act. George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA, pp. 41–55.
Barley, S.R., Tolbert, P.S., (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: studying the link between action and institution. Organization Studies 18, 93–117.
Barney, J., (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.
Bartlett, H.R., (1941). Development of industrial research. In: National Research Council (Ed.), Research: A National Resource in the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Baxter, J.P., (1946). Scientists Against Time. Little Brown, Boston.
Beckert, J., (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: the role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies 20, 777–799.
Birr, K., (1957). Pioneering in Industrial Research: The Story of General Electric Research Lab. Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC.
Bozeman, B., Boardman, C., (2004). The NSF engineering research centers and the university-industry research revolution: a brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch. Journal of Technology Transfer 29, 365–375.
Bush, V., (1945). Science – The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Castells, M., (2000). The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Castells, M., Hall, P., (1994). Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first Century Industrial Complexes. Routledge, London.
Chacar, A.S., Hesterly, W., (2008). Institutional settings and rent appropriation by knowledge-based employees: the case of major league baseball. Managerial and Decision Economics 29, 117–136.
Chandler, A.D., (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chandler, A.D., (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chandler, A.D., (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chesbrough, H., (2001). Rethinking corporate research: is the central R&D model obsolete? MIT Technology Review, April 24.
Chesbrough, H., (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chung, S., Singh, H., Lee, K., (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1–22.
Coase, R.H., (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386–405.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.
Connor, K.R., Prahalad, C.K., (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7, 477–501.
Dierickx, I., Cool, K., (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35, 1504–1511.
DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 45, 147–160.
Dosi, G., (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11, 147–162.
Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., (1998). The relational-view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive strategy. Academy of Management Review 23, 660–679.
Fisk, C.L., (1998). Removing the ‘fuel of interest’ from the ‘fire of genius’: law and the employee-inventor, 1830-1930. University of Chicago Law Review 65, 1127–1198.
Fisk, C.L., (2001). Working knowledge: trade secrets, restrictive covenants in employments, and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800-1920. Hastings Law Journal 52, 441–535.
Fligstein, N., (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Florida, R., Kenney, M., (1990). The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
Foss, N.J., (1996). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science 7, 470–476.
Furman, N.S., (1990). Sandia National Laboratories: The Postwar Decade. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
Geels, F.W., (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33, 897–920.
Graham, M.B.W., Pruitt, B.H., (1990). R&D for Industry: A Century of Technical Innovation at Alcoa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Granovetter, M.S., (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.
Grueber, M., Studt, T., (2009). 2010 Global R&D Funding Forecast. R&D Magazine, December, pp. 1–34.
Guralnick, S.M., (1979). The American scientist in higher education, 1820-1910. In: Reingold, N. (Ed.), The Sciences in the American Context: New Perspectives. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 99–141.
Hagedoorn, J., (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14, 371–385.
Hagedoorn, J., (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31, 477–492.
Hagedoorn, J., (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review 31, 670–680.
Ham, R.M., Mowery, D.C., (1995). Enduring dilemmas in U.S. technology policy. California Management Review 37, 89–107.
Hannaway, O., (1976). The German model of chemical education in America: Ira Remsen and Johns Hopkins, 1876-1913. Ambix 23, 145–164.
Hargadon, A., Douglas, Y., (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the decision of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly 46, 476–501.
Hargrave, T.J., Van de Ven, A.H., (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review 31, 864–888.
Hart, D.M., (2001). Antitrust and technological innovation in the U.S.: ideas, decisions, and impacts, 1890-2000. Research Policy 30, 923–936.
Heilbroner, R.L., (1967). Do machines make history? Technology and Culture 8, 335–345.
Hewlett, R.G., Anderson, O.E., (1962). The New World: A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC.
Hewlett, R.G., Duncan, F., (1972). Atomic Shield: A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC.
Hewlett, R.G., Holl, J.M., (1989). Atoms for Peace and War, 1953-1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Hladik, K.J., (1985). International Joint Ventures. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Hodgson, G.M., (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36, 166–192.
Hounshell, D.A., (1996). The evolution of industrial research in the United States. In: Rosenbloom, R.S., Spencer, W.J. (Eds.), Engines of Innovation: U. S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 13–85.
Hounshell, D.A., Smith, J.K., (1988). Science and Corporate Strategy: DuPont R&D, 1902-1980. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Howells, J., (1999). Research and technology outsourcing. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11, 17–29.
Ingram, P., Clay, K., (2000). The choice within constraints: new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 525–546.
Jaques Cattell Press, (1979). Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States, 16th ed. R.R. Bowker Company, New York and London.
Katz, R., Allen, T.J., (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12, 7–19.
Kevles, D.J., (1978). The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Knopf, New York, NY.
Keyworth II, G.A., (1986). Improving the U.S. position in international industrial competitiveness. In: The New Engineering Research Centers: Purposes, Goals, and Expectations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 11–18.
Khan, B.Z., Sokoloff, K.L., (2001). History lessons: the early development of intellectual property institutions in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 233–246.
Kogut, B., Zander, U., (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 7, 502–518.
Kortum, S., Lerner, J., (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 31, 674–692.
Lamoreaux, N.R., (1986). Banks, kinship, and economic development: The New England case. Journal of Economic History 46, 647–667.
Lamoreaux, N.R., Sokoloff, K.L., (1996). Long-term change in the organization of inventive activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 12686–12692.
Lamoreaux, N.R., Sokoloff, K.L., (1997). Location and technological change in the American glass industry during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. NBER Working Paper No. 5938.
Lamoreaux, N.R., Sokoloff, K.L., (1999). Inventive activity and the market for technology in the United States, 1840-1920. NBER Working Paper No. 7107.
Lamoreaux, N.R., Sokoloff, K.L., (2002). Intermediaries in the U.S. market for technology, 1870-1920. NBER Working Paper No 9017.
Langlois, R., (2003). The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change 12, 351–385.
Lee, Y.S., (1997). Technology Transfer and Public Policy. Quorum, Westport, CT.
Liebenau, J.M., (1984). International R&D in pharmaceutical firms in the early twentieth century. Business History 26, 329–346.
Lieberman, M.B., Asaba, S., (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review 31, 366–385.
Markham, J., (1974). Concentration: a stimulant of retardant to innovation? In: Goldschmid, H., Mann, H., Weston, J. (Eds.), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning. Little Brown, Boston, MA.
Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.
Mowery, D.C., (1983)a. Industrial research and firm size, survival, and growth in American manufacturing, 1921-1946: an assessment. Journal of Economic History 43, 953–980.
Mowery, D.C., (1983)b. The relationship between contractual and intrafirm forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1944. Explorations in Economic History 20, 351–374
Mowery, D.C., (1992). The U.S. national innovation system: origins and prospects for change. Research Policy 21, 125–144.
Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., (1989). Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N., Ziedonis, A.A., (2001). The growth of patenting by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30, 99–119.
National Research Council (NRC), (1927). Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States, 3rd ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
National Science Foundation, (1989). National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1989. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
Nee, V., (1992). Organization dynamics of market transitions: hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 1–27.
Nelles, M., (1958). Make-or-buy decisions. Research Management 1, 251–259.
Nelson, R.R., (1962). The link between science and invention: the case of the transistor. In: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Nelson, R.R., (2001). Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 13–19.
North, D.C., (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Page, W., (1991). Ideological conflict and the origins of antitrust policy. Tulane Law Review 66, 1–67.
Peck, M., (1961). Concentration in the Aluminum Industry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pisano, G.P., (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 153–176.
Powell, W.W., (1987). Hybrid organizational arrangements: new form of transitional development. California Management Review 30, 67–87.
Reich, L.S., (1980). Industrial research and the pursuit of corporate security: the early years of Bell Labs. Business History Review 54, 504–529.
Reich, L.S., (1985). The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876-1926. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Rigby, D., Zook, C., (2002). Open-market innovation. Harvard Business Review 80, 5–12.
Ring, P.S., Van de Ven, A.H., (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13, 483–498.
Roberts, E.B., (1991). Entrepreneurs in High Technology, Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Robertson, T.S., Gatignon, H., (1998). Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal 19, 515–531.
Rosenberg, N., (1969). The American System of Manufactures. University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh.
Rosenberg, N., (1990). Why do firms for basic research (with their own money). Research Policy 19, 165–174.
Rowland, H.A., (1902). Physical Papers of Henry A. Rowland. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Ruttan, V.W., (2001). Technology, Growth and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Sampson, R.C., (2005). Experience, learning & collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal 26, 1009–1031.
Scherer, F., (1977). The Economic Effects of Compulsory Patent Licensing. NYU Graduate School of Business Administration, New York, NY.
Schilling, M.A., (2009). Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management Journal 30, 233–260.
Schön, D.A., (1971). Beyond the Stable State. Norton, New York, NY.
Schumpeter, J.A., (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
Scott, W.R., (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Seidel, R.W., (1983). Accelerating science: the postwar transformation of the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 13, 375–400.
Seidel, R.W., (1986). A home for big science: the atomic energy Commission’s laboratory system. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 16, 137–175.
Seidel, R.W., (1987). From glow to flow: a history of military laser research and development. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 18, 111–147.
Seidel, R.W., (1990). Clio and the complex: recent historiography of science and national security. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 13, 420–441.
Seidel, R.W., (1994). Accelerators and national security: the evolution of science policy for high-energy physics, 1947-1967. History and Technology 11, 361–391.
Sine, W.D., David, R.J., (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy 32, 185–207.
Suh, N.P., (1986). The concept and goals of the engineering research centers. In: The New Engineering Research Centers: Purposes, Goals, and Expectations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 37 43.
Swann, P., (1989). Academic Scientists and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Cooperative Research in Twentieth-Century America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Teece, D.J., (1988). Technological change and the nature of the firm. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R.R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, New York, NY, pp. 256–281.
Thorelli, H., (1955). The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Tolbert, P.S., Zucker, L.G., (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 22–39.
Usselman, S.W., (1999). Patents, engineering professionals, and the pipelines of innovation: the internalization of technical discovery by nineteenth-century American railroads. In: Lamoreaux, N.R., Raff, D.M.G., Temin, P. (Eds.), Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 61–101.
Walker, F., (1891). The place of schools of technology in American education. Educational Review 2, 211.
Waller, S.W., (2005). Thurman Arnold: A Biography. NYU Press, New York, NY.
Williamson, O.E., (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. The Free Press, New York, NY.
Williamson, O.E., (1981). The modern corporation: origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature 19, 1537–1568.
Williamson, O.E., (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press, New York, NY.
Williamson, O.E., (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works, where it is headed. De Economist 146, 23–58.
Williamson, O.E., (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38, 595–613.
Wise, G., (1985). Willis Whitney, General Electric, and the Origins of U. S Industrial Research. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Zachary, G.P., (1997). Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush Engineer of the American Century. The Free Press, New York, NY.
Zollo, M., Reuer, J.J., Singh, H., (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science 12, 701–713.
Zucker, L.G., (1982). Institutional structure and organizational processes: the role of evaluation units in schools. In: Bank, A., Williams, R.C. (Eds.), Studies in Evaluation and Decision Making. Center for the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 69–89