Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms

Document Type : Translation


1 Ph.D. student of science and technology policy at Mazandaran University

2 Master of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology


The paper explores the process of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms. Drawing on casestudies of British and Dutch biopharmaceutical R&D firms, we conceptualize the speed of early growth of science-based firms as the time it takes for the assembly (or combined development) of three types of critical resources—a functionally-diverse management team, early fundraising and development of technology. The development of these resources is an unfolding and interrelated process, the causaldirection of which is highly ambiguous. We show the variety of paths used by science-based firms toaccess and develop these critical resources. The picture that emerges is that the various combinations of what we call “assisted” and “unassisted” paths combine to influence the speed of firm growth. We show how a wide range of manifestations of technology development act as signaling devices to attract funding and management, affecting the speed of firm development. We also show how the variety of paths andthe speed of development are influenced by the national institutional setting.


Allen, M., 2006. The Varieties of Capitalism Paradigm: Explaining Germany's Comparative Advantage? Palgrave, London.
Almeida, P., Kogut, B .. 1999. Localization of knowledge and mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manage. Sci. 45 (7), 905-917.
Alsos, G.A., Kolvereid, L., 1998. The business gestation process of novice, serial, and parallel business founders. Entrepreneurship: Theory Pract. 22 (4), 101-102.
Amable, B .. 2000. Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Rev. Int. Polit. Economy 7 (4). 645-687.
Ambos, T.C., Birkinshaw,].. 2010. How do ventures evolve? An inductive study of the process of charter change in technology ventures. Organ. Sci. 21 (6), 1125-1140.
Andries, P .. Debackere, K .. van Looy, B., 2013. Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: business model development under uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship]. 7 (4), 288-310.
Audretsch, D.B., Bonte, W., Mahagaonkar, P., 2012. Financial signaling by innovative nascent ventures: the relevance of patents and prototypes. Res. Policy 41, 1407-1421.
Autio, E., 1997. 'Atomistic' and 'systemic' approaches to research on new, technology-based firms: a literature study. Small Bus. Econ. 9, 195-209.
Baum, J.A., Silverman, B.S., 2004. Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19, 411-436.
Beckman, C., Burton, M.D., O'Reilly, C., 2007. Early teams: the impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22 (2), 147-173.
Best, M.H .. Garnsey, E., 1999. Edith Penrose. 1914-1996. Econ.]. 109, 187-201. Burton, M.D., Sorensen, J.B., Beckman, C.M., 2002. Coming from good stock: career histories and new venture formation. In: Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M.J. (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 229-262.
Casper, S., Matraves, C., 2003. Institutional frameworks and innovation in the German and UK pharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy 32, 1865-1879.
Casper, S., Whitley, R., 2004. Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms. Res. Policy 33, 89-106.
Casper, S., 2007. How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable?:
Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Res. Policy 36 (4), 438-455.
Casper, S., 2009. Can new technology firms succeed in coordinated market economies? A response to Herrmann and Lange. Soc. Econ. Rev. 7 (2), 209-215.
Certo, S.T., 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signaling with board structures. Acad. Manage. Rev. 28, 432-446.
Chiles, T.H., Bluedorn, A.C., Gupta, V.K., 2007. Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: a radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organ. Stud. 28 (4), 467-493.
Clarysse, B., Moray, N., 2004. A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. J. Bus. Venturing 19, 55-79.
Clarysse, B .. Bruneel, J., Wright, M .. 2011. Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 5, 137-157.
Colombo, M., Mus tar, P., Wright, M., 2010. Dynamics of science-based entrepreneurship. J. Tech. Transfer 35, 1-5.
Conti, A., Thursby, M., Rothaermel, F.T., 2013. Show me the right stuff: signals for high-tech startups.]. Econ. Manage. Strategy 22, 341-364.
Crouch, C., Streek, W., Boyer, R., Amable, B., Hall, P., Jackson, G., 2005. Dialogue on "institutional complementarity and political economy". Soc. Econ. Rev. 3 (2), 359-382.
Denis, J.L.. Lamothe, L., Langley, A., 2001. The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Acad. Manage.]. 44 (4), 809-837.
DiGregorio, D .. Shane, S., 2003. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Res. Policy 32 (2), 209-227.
DiVito, L., 2012. Institutional entrepreneurship in constructing alternative paths: a comparison of biotech hybrids. Res. Policy 41 (5 ). 884-896.
Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London.
Druilhe, C., Garnsey, E .. 2004. Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? J.
Technol. Transf. 29, 269-285.
Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Manage. J. 31, 543-576.
Forbes, D.P., 2005. Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures.
Strategic Manage.]. 26 (4), 355-366.
Garnsey, E., Leong, Y.Y., 2008. Combining resource-based and evolutionary theory to explain the genesis ofbio-networks. Industry Innovation 15 (6), 669-686.
Garnsey, E .. 1998. A theory of the early growth of the firm. Ind. Corp. Change 7 (3), 523-556.
Gospel, H., Pendelton, A., Vitals, S. (Eds.), 2014. Financialisation New Investment Funds and Labour: An International Comparison. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hall, P.A., Soskice, D .. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Haussler, C., Harhoff, D., Muller, E., 2014. How patenting informs VC investors: the case of biotechnology. Res. Policy 43 (8), 1286-1298.
Heimeriks, G., Boschma, R., 2014. The path-and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986-2008. J. Econ. Geogr. 14, 339-364.
Hellman, T., Puri, M., 2000. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital. Rev. Finan. Stud. 13 (4), 959-984.
Herrmann, A.M .. 2008. Rethinking the link between labour market flexibility and corporate competitiveness: a critique of the institutionalist literature. Soc. Econ. Rev. 6, 637-669.
Hite, J.M., Hesterley, W.S., 2001. The evolution affirm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Manage.). 33, 275-386.
Hoenen, S .. Kolympiris, C., Shenmakers. W .. Kalaitzandonakes, N .. 2014. The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Res. Policy 43, 956-989.
Hoenig, D., Henkel, J., 2015. Quality signals? The role of patents, alliances, and team experience in venture capital financing. Res. Policy 44, 1049-1064.
Hollingsworth, J .. Boyer, R., 1999. Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hopkins, M., Philippa, N., Crane, A., Nightingale, P., Baden-Fuller, C., 2013. Buying big into biotech: scale, financing, and the industrial dynamics of UK biotech, 1980-2009. lnd. Corp. Change 22 (4). 903-952.
Hsu, D.H., Ziedonis, R .. 2013. Resources as dual sources of advantage: implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents. Strategic Manage. J. 34, 761-781.
Hsu, D.H., 2007. Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36 (5), 722-741.
Kazanjian, R.K .. 1988. Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Acad. Manage.]. 31 (2), 257-279.
Kenney, M., 1986. Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Kha ire, M., 2010. Young and no money? Never mind: the material impact of social resources on new venture growth. Organ. Sci. 21 ( 1 ). 168-185.
Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Clarysse, B .. 2011. The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: the case of science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 35 (4), 777-803.
Kolympiris, C., Kalaitzandonakes. N .. Miller, D .. 2014. Public funds and local biotechnology firm creation. Res. Policy 43 (1 ). 121-137.
Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney,J.T., 2004. Edith Penrose's (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management. J. Manage. Stud. 4 (1 ), 183-191.
Kroll, M .. Walters, B., Le, S.A., 2007. The impact of board composition and top management ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Manage.). 50 (5), 1198-1216.
Lange, K., 2009. Institutional embeddedness and the strategic leeway of actors: the case of the German therapeutical biotech industry. Soc. Econ. Rev. 7, 181-207.
Langley, A .. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24 (4), 691-710.
Lazonick, E., 2002. The US industrial corporation and the theory of the growth of the firm. In: Pitelis, C. (Ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Lee, C., Lee, K .. Pennings, J.M., 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based. Strategic Manage.). 22, 615-640.
Liebeskind,].. Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L., Brewer, M .. 1996. Social networks, learning, flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. 7 (4), 428-443.
Lockett, A., 2005. Edith Penrose's legacy to the resource-based view. Managerial Decis. Econ. 26, 83-98.
Luukkonen, T., 2005. Variability in organizational forms of biotechnology firms.
Res. Policy 34, 555-570.
Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1996. Schumperian patterns of innovation are technology specific. Res. Policy 25 (3), 451-478.
Mangematin, V., Lemarie, S., Biossin, J.-P., Catherine, D., Corolleur, F .. Coronini, R., Trommetter, M., 2003. Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: the case of biotechnology in France. Res. Policy 32, 621-638.
Mansfield, E., 1961. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29, 741-766.
Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P.H., Balkin, D.B., 2005. Innovation speed Transferring university technology to market. Res. Policy 34 (7), 1058-1075.
Miles, M., Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis, second ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Miozzo, M., DiVito, L., Desyllas, P .. 2016. Cross-border acquisitions of science-based firms: their effect on innovation in the acquired firm and the local science and technology system. Long Range Plann., forthcoming.
Mosakowski, E., 1998. Entrepreneurial resources, organizational choices, and competitive outcomes. Organ. Sci. 9 (6), 625-643.
Muller, K .. 2010. Academic spin-offs transfer speed: analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Res. Policy 39, 189-199.
Murray, F., 2004. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Res. Policy 33, 643-659.
Mustar, P .. Renault, M., Colombo, M.G .. Pica, E .. Fontes, M .. Lockett, A., Wright, M ..
Clarysse, B., Moray, N., 2006. Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy. Res. Policy 35, 289-308.
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
OECD, 2004. Case Study on Innovation: The Dutch Pharmaceutical and Food Biotechnology Innovation Systems. OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2009. Biotechnology Statistics. OECD, Paris.
Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W., 1998. Knowledge universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. j. Pol. Anal. Manage. 17 (2), 253-277.
Penrose, E., 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Perez, C., 1983. Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures 15, 357-375.
Pettigrew, A., 1992. The character and significance of strategy process research.
Strategic Manage. J. 13, 5-16.
Pettus, M .. 2001. The resource-based view as a developmental growth process: evidence from the deregulated trucking industry. Acad. Manage.]. 44 (4), 878-896.
Pisano, G., 2006. Science Business: The Promise the Reality and the Future of Biotech. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA.
Powell, W.W., Kopu, K., Smith-Doerr, L., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Ad min. Sci. Q41, 116-145.
Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., Wright, M., 2011. The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: a longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. J. Manage. Stud. 48 (6), 1316-1342.
Rerup, C., Feldman, M.S .. 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Manage.]. 54 (3), 577-610.
Saxenian, A .. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sirmon, D., Hitt, M., Ireland, R.D., Gilbert, B.A., 2011. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth and life cycle effects. J. Manage. 37 (5), 1390-1412.
Soskice, D .. 1999. Divergent production regimes: coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In: Kitschelt, H .. Lange, P., Marks, G., Stephens, J.D. (Eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 101-134.
Sternitzke, C., 2010. Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovation. Res. Policy 39 (6), 810-821.
Suddaby, R., 2006. From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad. Manage.]. 49 ( 4 ), 633-642.
Tsoukas, H., Chia, R., 2002. On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13 (5), 567-582.
Tylecote, A .. Visintin, F .. 2007. Corporate Governance Finance and the Technological Advantage of Nations. Routledge, London.
van de Ven, H., Poole, M.S., 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 26 (9), 1377-1404.
von Tunzelmann, N., 1995. Technology and Industrial Progress. The Foundations of Economic Growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Whitley, R., 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yin, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Zucker, LG .. Darby, M.R., Brewer, M.B .. 1998. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Am. Econ. Rev. 88 (1 ), 290-306.