عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری شبکه مشارکت نخبگان علمی در سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای مدیریت دولتی ؛ دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

علم و فناوری در عصر حاضر با سرعت بیشتری در حال تغییر و تحول است. از این رو نیاز است سیاستگذاری در این حوزه نیز با رویکردها و ساز و کارهایی که سرعت و چابکی را تضمین می‌کند انجام شود. علاوه بر این نیاز است نخبگان این حوزه در فرایندهای سیاستگذاری نقش فعالی داشته باشند. ساز و کار شبکه یکی از ساز و کارهای کارآمدی است که با استفاده از آن می‌توان گروه‌های مختلف را با سرعت بیشتری در فرایند سیاستگذاری مشارکت داد. از جمله چالش‌های شبکه مشارکت نخبگان علمی در سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری در ایران پایداری آن می‌باشد. در این پژوهش به عوامل مؤثر بر این پایداری پرداخته شده است. برای رسیدن به این عوامل مبتنی بر رویکرد تفسیری از روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شده است. مضامین مورد نیاز از طریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختار یافته با سه گروه مجری، نخبه علمی و نخبه سیاستگذاری به دست آمده است. مبتنی بر تحلیل‌ها و یافته‌های پژوهش 7 عامل مؤثر بر پایداری این شبکه‌ها شناسایی شده‌اند. عامل محوری در این زمینه هیجان و انگیزش مشارکت می‌باشد. این انگیزش در بافتار نخبگی علم و فناوری به عنوان عامل دوم محقق می‌شود. معماری و ساختار صحیح شبکه، استقلال اقتصادی، ابزارها و ساز و کارهای ارتباطی مناسب، و وجود دبیرخانه سایر عواملی هستند که ضمن در نظر گرفتن از بافتار بر هیجان و انگیزش تأثیر می‌گذارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Scientific Elite Participation Networks in Science and Technology Policymaking in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Ferdosi Jahromi 1
  • Davood Hosseinpour 2
1 PhD in Public Administration; Allameh Tabatabaei University
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University
چکیده [English]

Science and technology are changing and evolving at a faster rate in today's era. Therefore, it is necessary to make policies in this area with approaches and mechanisms that guarantee speed and agility. In addition, there is a need for the elites of this field to play an active role in policy making processes. The network mechanism is one of the efficient mechanisms that can be used to involve different groups more quickly in the policy making process. Among the challenges of scientific elite participation networks in science and technology policymaking in Iran is the sustainability of such networks. In this research, the factors affecting this sustainability have been discussed. To reach these factors based on an interpretive approach, thematic analysis method has been used. The required themes were obtained through semi-structured interviews with three groups: executive, scientific elite and the policy-making elite. Based on the analysis and findings of the research, 7 factors affecting the sustainability of these networks have been identified. The central factor in this context is the excitement and motivation of participation. This motivation is realized in the context of science and technology elites as the second factor. The correct architecture and structure of the network, economic independence, appropriate communication tools and mechanisms, and the existence of a secretariat are other factors that, while being considered by the context, affect excitement and motivation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Science and technology policy making
  • Participation of scientific elites
  • Sustainability of participation
  • Partnership network

مراجع

  • Abbasi, H., and Daneshfard, K. (2021). The model of citizen participation in the first stage of public policy-making (identification of public issues). Interdisciplinary Studies in Strategic Knowledge, 11(42), 247-270. {In Persian}
  • Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M. S., Faghihi, A., and Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Thematic analysis and thematic networks: A simple and effective method for exploring patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thought, 5(2), 151-198. {In Persian}
  • Arasti, M. R., and Haghighat, M. (2021). Dual-core innovation networks stability: antecedents and moderating factors. Science and Technology Policy, 14(3), 19-36. {In Persian}
  • Asadifard, R. (2019). The policies for stimulating networks in science and technology development. Science and Technology Policy, 11(2), 333-346. {In Persian}
  • Babaei, M. R., Hosseini, S. M., and Samoudi, M. R. (2016). Citizen participation in policy-making: An explanation of the manifestation of citizenship rights in good governance. The Second National Conference on Explaining Citizenship Rights. {In Persian}
  • Beygi, V., and Alimohammadi, A. (2015). Identification of factors impacting the failure of science collaboration and innovation networks: the pathology of the offices of mediator institution. Technology Development Management, 3(3), 81-104. {In Persian}
  • Brown Jr, C. W., Hedges, R. B., and Powell, L. W. (1980). Modes of elite political participation: Contributors to the 1972 presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 259-290
  • Davis, Gerald F., Greve, Henrich R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37
  • Ferdosi Jahromi, A., and Hosseinpour, D. (2024). Architectural model of network participation of scientific elites in science and technology policymaking in Iran. Public Policy, 10(2), 9-25. {In Persian}
  • Fuchs, E. R. (2010). Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, 39(9), 1133-1147
  • Ghadimi, A., and Hejazi, E. (2019). Science, technology and science popularization policy in Iran: a national necessity. Science Promotion, 10(2), 5-31. {In Persian}
  • GhaziNouri, S. S., Roshani, S., and Rajabzadeh, M. (2017). A virtual social network for Iranian elites: Requirements of design and implementation. Cultural-Communication Studies, 17(36), 145-173. {In Persian}
  • Gholipour, R., and Gholampour Ahangar, E. (2010). The process of public policy-making in Iran. Tehran, Iran:  Research center of the Islamic Parliament. . {In Persian}
  • Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252
  • Gusman, D., Syofyan, Yu. (2023) Public participation in legislation (Legal comparation studies in indonesia, south africa, and united state). Nagari Law Review, 6(2), 133-145
  • Hazlehurst, D. (2001). Networks and policy making: from theory to practice in Australian social policy. Australia: ANU Research Publications
  • Josselin, D. (2007). Domestic policy networks and European negotiations: Evidence from British and French financial services. Journal of European Public Policy, 3(3), 297-317
  • Kalantari, E., Montazer, G., and Ghazinoory, S. (2021). Mapping of a science and technology policy network based on social network analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(3), 115-147. {In Persian}
  • Khane Mellat News Agency. (2020). The necessity of establishing national and local elite networks in the research center of the parliament. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/1595758. {In Persian}
  • Knoke, David. (1993). Networks of elite structure and decision making. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(1), 23-45
  • Matin, N. (1998). Theoretical foundations of participation and its necessities. Tehran, Iran: Jahad. {In Persian}
  • Mazarei, S. H., Asadi Fard, R., Khaledi, A., and Pakzad Bonab, M. (2022). Strengthening relationships in science and technology collaborative networks during four years case study: Nanotechnology laboratory network. Modern Management, 11(3), 119-145. {In Persian}
  • McNabb, D. (2016). Quantitative and qualitative research methods (Volume 2) (R. Vaezi and M. S. Azmandian, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Safar. {In Persian}
  • Mehr News Agency. (2004). Launching the national elite network in the Research Center of the Parliament. https://mehrnews.com/x39TC. {In Persian}
  • Nsiri, H. (2025). Identifying the effective factors on the interactions of stakeholders during the process of science and technology policy making. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 14(4), 36-52. {In Persian}
  • Nilforoushan, H., and Arasti, M. R. (2013). The weak failure process of engineered innovation networks in the initiation phase: The case study of gas industry in Iran. Science and Technology Policy, 6(4), 1-17. {In Persian}
  • Nilforoushan, H., and Arasti, M. R. (2014). The process of innovation network failure: A knowledge-based approach. Science and Technology Policy, 7(4), 89-106. {In Persian}
  • O'Toole, Laurence J. (1997). Networking requirements, institutional capacity, and implementation gaps in transitional regimes: the case of acidification policy in Hungary. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 1-17
  • ParlAmericas (2016). Citizen Participation in the Legislative Process. www.Parlamericas.org
  • Provan, K. G., and Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal Of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
  • Quick, K. S., and Bryson, J. M. (2016). Public participation. In Handbook on theories of governance. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Raab, J., Mannak, R. S., and Cambré, B. (2015). Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal Of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 479-511.
  • Ramezanpour, D., Abdolhamid, M., Rezaeian, A. (2020). Presentation of a model for factors affecting the participation of elites in the process of formulation of the public policymaking of the Islamic republic of Iran. Public Management Researches, 12(46), 37-67
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2009). Policy Network Analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy,  3, 425-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0020
  • Sabatier, P. (2017). Theories of the policy process. (H. Danaee Fard, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Safar Publications. (Original work published in 2007). {In Persian}
  • Sandström, A., Carlsson, L. (2008). The performance of policy networks: the relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497-524
  • Sarewitz, D., Foladori, G., Invernizzi, N., and Garfinkel, M. S. (2004). Science policy in its social context. Philosophy today, 48(Supplement), 67-83.
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson education.
  • Shahabi, A., Azar, A., Radfar, R., and Asadi Fard, R. (2020). Analysis of Mode of Orchestration Structures of Formal Collaborative Network of Science and Technology in Iran. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 10(4), 21-36. {In Persian}
  • Sheikhzadeh, H. (2006). Elites and the development of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Baz. {In Persian}
  • Smith, Bruce L. (2003). Public Policy and Public Participation Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy. Canada: Population and Public Health Branch
  • Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution (2006), Regulations for identifying superior and elite talents. {In Persian}
  • Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., and Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public administration, 88(2), 528-550.
  • Zang, X. (2006). Elites, Social Change and Policy-Making in China: An Introduction. Policy and Society, 25(1), 1-8

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 22 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 18 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 19 اسفند 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار